Electrotonic-Cigarette or Vaping Product Use Associated Lung Injury: Diagnosis of Exclusion

Ali A. Mahdi MD, Chris Allahverdian MD, Sharareh Shahangian MD

Dignity Health, St Mary Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Long Beach, California 90813, USA

Abstract

The first reports of lung injury attributable to vaping date back to 2012, but the ongoing outbreak of electrotonic-cigarette or vaping product use associated lung injury (EVALI) began in 2019. It is a diagnosis of exclusion. In this case report, we describe a patient with history of excessive vaping for the last 3 weeks who was admitted to the intensive care unit for acute hypoxic respiratory failure. The patient was diagnosed with EVALI given the history of vaping in the setting of negative infectious work-up and radiographic imaging that showed lung opacities.

Case Presentation 

A 37-year-old man with no significant past medical history initially presented to the emergency department (ED) with “chest pain and trouble breathing.” He reported first feeling chest pain localized to the substernal region 5 days prior to presentation; described it as pleuritic in nature; and rated intensity as severe. The patient stated deep breaths and laying flat aggravated his pain, while leaning forward relieved it. He also reported associated subjective fevers, non-productive cough, nausea and diarrhea but denied any lower extremity swelling, calf pain, prolonged immobilization, or history of congestive heart failure (CHF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE).

The patient denied any past medical or surgical history and reported not being on any medications or over-the-counter supplements. He denied any medication, diet, or environmental allergies. He lives in an apartment (built in the 1990s) with his wife, and does not have any pets. Patient works full-time at a box manufacturing facility where he processes shipping labels, reports drinking approximately 5 to 6 beers a day, denies any history of illicit drug use. He smoked one pack per day for the past ten years, but reported to have quit smoking over the last month. 

Due to his significantly worsening shortness of breath and severe chest pain, he was prompted to present to the ED. Upon presentation, he was febrile (38.9 degrees Celsius), hypoxic (saturating at 88%) in the setting of tachypneic (22 breaths per minute), tachycardic (117 beats per minute), and normotensive (systolic of 105 mmHg). Patient was started on supplemental oxygen, 4 Liters (L) nasal cannula (NC), yet had been noted to continue to desaturate in the mid-80's. Despite being transitioned to 11L non-rebreather mask, he remained tachypneic and hypoxic, and was subsequently started on high flow nasal cannula (HFNC), 50L at 0.50 fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2).

Physical examination was significant for a man who appeared about the stated age in respiratory distress. He was noted to have scleral icterus, yellow skin discoloration, supraclavicular retraction, increased respiratory exertion, and fine bibasilar crackles. S1 & S2 were heard but no additional heart sounds or friction rubs were noted. His abdomen was soft, nondistended, nontender to superficial or deep palpation, without organomegaly, but with normal bowel sounds. No superficial venous dilation or telangiectasia was noted. Upper and lower extremities were without edema or tenderness. Homan’s sign was negative.

Initial laboratory investigations were significant for leukocytosis (white blood cell count of 12.6 K/uL), normocytic anemia (hemoglobin 8.2 g/dl) with an INR of 1.25, D-dimer 415 ng/ml DDU, troponin 0 ng/ml, hyponatremia (serum sodium 130 mmol/L), potassium 3.8 mmol/L, creatinine 0.79 mg/dL, BUN of 7mg/dL, alanine transaminase 21 IU/L, aspartate transaminase 63 IU/L, alkaline phosphatase 178 IU/L, gamma-glutamine transaminase 224 IU/L, total bilirubin 6.9 mg/dL (direct bilirubin 5.9 mg/dL). His lactic acid was elevated at 3.76 mEq/L. SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) nasal swab was negative. Urine analysis was positive for moderate bilirubin. Urine toxicology was negative. 

Arterial blood gas while on HFNC showed pH 7.45, pCO2 27 mmHg, pO2 68 mmHg and HCO3 21 mEq/L. His PaO2:FiO2 was calculated to be 136, significant for moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Electrocardiogram (ECG) showed normal sinus rhythm, rate of 99 beats per minute, no ST segment changes or T wave inversions, without axis devious or conduction abnormalities.

Chest X-Ray (CXR) was significant for extensive patchy bilateral multifocal patchy infiltrates in the mid and lower lobes. Computer tomography (CT) of the chest without contrast (Figure 1) was significant for severe multifocal pneumonia with small bilateral pleural effusions.

Figure 1. Representative images from the computer tomography (CT) of the chest without contrast in (A) lung windows and (B) soft tissue widows. The CT was significant for severe multifocal pneumonia with small bilateral pleural effusions.

CT of the abdomen and pelvis with contrast was significant for hepatomegaly with diffuse fatty infiltrated, moderate gallbladder distention without intra or extra hepatic duct dilatation non-concerning for obstruction. Ultrasound (US) of the gallbladder revealed a distended gallbladder without evidence of stone or wall thickening, but was significant for sludge.

The patient was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with severe sepsis and acute hypoxic respiratory failure likely secondary to presumed viral versus bacterial community acquired pneumonia (CAP) requiring HFNC. Blood cultures were collected, and the patient was started on fluid resuscitation and broad-spectrum antibiotics. Sputum cultures, respiratory viral panel, atypical pneumonia serologies and urine for legionella and pneumococcal antigens were ordered.

His Well’s score was calculated at 1.5 placing him at a low risk for pulmonary embolism (PE) with a D-dimer of 415 ng/ml DDU, likely secondary to septic-inflammatory state. However, given his continued high oxygen requirement, saturating in the high-80s to the low-90s while on HFNC 50L of 60% FiO2, and increased respiratory effort, chest CT chest angiography was ordered but negative for PE or acute aortic pathology. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) demonstrates a preserved left ventricular function with an ejection fraction of 60%, without valvular disease or pericardial effusion.

Repeat CXR showed worsening diffuse multifocal infiltrates concerning for progressive ARDS. He was started on a 5-day course of systemic steroids (dexamethasone) given his worsening oxygen requirements and CXR findings. SARS-CoV2 nasal PCR was repeated as well, which remained negative. Cryptococcus, coccidiomycosis & QuantiFERON-Gold were ordered. His oxygen requirements improved. Labs revealed normalization of lactic acid and bilirubin with down-trending liver enzymes with correlating resolution of patient’s jaundice and icterus. He also reported significant improvement in his gastrointestinal symptoms. Subsequently, he was transferred from the ICU to the telemetry unit.

Infectious work-up (including Streptococcus pneumonia, chlamydia psittaci, chlamydia pneumonia, mycoplasma pneumonia, Legionella pneumonia, cryptococcus, aspergillosis, cryptococcus, histoplasmosis, human immunodeficiency virus, Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PCP), and tuberculosis), respiratory viral panel and cultures were all negative. Of note, the patient's wife reported that over the course of the last few weeks, the patient had started vaping e-cigarettes. Upon discussion, he that he started vaping a nicotine-containing product in order to quit smoking cigarettes 3-weeks ago, states that he has been “excessive vaping for the last 2-3 weeks.”

Given newfound history of vaping in the setting of negative infectious work-up and CT imaging that showed dense ground glass opacities throughout, differential diagnosis now included E-cigarette, or vaping product, use associated lung injury (EVALI) versus respiratory bronchiolitis associated interstitial lung disease (RB-ILD) secondary to smoking. He was treated with high dose systemic steroids (methylprednisolone) and PCP prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. The broad-spectrum antibiotics were discontinued.

He started to demonstrate significant improvement in his oxygen requirement and in his clinical symptoms, was no longer coughing and was able to ambulate without dyspnea. Repeat CT scan demonstrated interval improvement in pulmonary infiltrates, although radiographic findings on CT were still significant for diffuse pulmonary infiltrates. The patient had near-complete resolution of symptoms, was titrated down to 2L NC, was transitioned to room air, and discharged on hospital day 21 on a steroid taper and PCP prophylaxis.

Discussion 

The first reports of lung injury attributable to vaping date back to 2012, but the ongoing outbreak of electrotonic-cigarette or vaping product use associated lung injury (EVALI) began in 2019 (1). By February 2020, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) documented over 2800 EVALI hospitalizations, amongst which 68 patients died (2). E-cigarettes function to aerosolize various chemicals (including nicotine, tetrahydrocannabinol, favoring and other additives) for inhalation (3). EVALI is a form of acute or subacute lung injury whose pathogenesis is unknown and is thought to be a spectrum of disease, rather than a single process (4,11). The histopathological patterns include acute fibrinous pneumonitis, diffuse alveolar damage and organizing pneumonia, more commonly bronchiolocentric with accompanying bronchiolitis (5). This spectrum of nonspecific acute lung injury commonly presents with cough, dyspnea, gastrointestinal symptoms with accompanying constitutional symptoms (1).

Radiographic findings of EVALI demonstrate a spectrum of nonspecific acute lung injury patterns. Bilateral opacities are typically seen, the majority of chest radiographs demonstrate diffuse hazy or consolidative opacities (6). CT opacities are typically ground glass in density and may spare subpleural spaces. Pleural effusions are less common findings (7). Other radiographic patterns have been noted suggestive of one or more disease processes: diffuse alveolar damage (dependent consolidation, diffuse ground glass and air bronchograms), acute eosinophilic pneumonitis (centrilobular ground glass opacities in the anterior lung fields, confluent ground glass opacities in dependent areas and lobules of mosaic attenuation) and organizing pneumonia (diffuse, multifocal discrete and confluent) (7).

EVALI is a diagnosis of exclusion; thus, pulmonary infectious causes and other etiologies of progressive respiratory insufficiency should be excluded (7). Currently CDC criteria for a confirmed case of EVALI include: (1) Use of e-cigarette or related products in the last 90 days, (2) Lung opacities on CXR or CT, (3) Exclusion of lung infection, including negative influenza polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or rapid test (unless out of season), viral respiratory panel, and if clinically indicated, urine antigen tests for Legionella and Streptococcus pneumonia, blood & sputum cultures, bronchoalveolar lavage and HIV-related opportunistic infections, (4) absence of likely alternative diagnosis including cardiovascular disease, rheumatologic disease and neoplastic (2).

Supportive care initially focuses on management of hypoxia with supplemental oxygen at a goal saturation of 88 to 92% (3). Empiric antibiotics should also be initiated to cover likely pathogens for CAP. Although the optimal treatment of EVALI is not yet known, systemic glucocorticoids have been used in the majority of patients with varying efficacy (9). Given the postential efficacy and low incidence of adverse effects, systemic glucocorticoids should be considered in EVALI cases with progressively worsening symptoms and hypoxemia (7,10). Flexible bronchoscopy may be utilized in excluding other causes of non-resolving or progressive pneumonitis; however, bronchoscopy is generally reserved for patients with progressive or severe symptoms despite treatment.

Our patient’s initial complaint of chest pain upon presentation raised concerns for cardiovascular disease. ECG without any signs of acute ischemia in the setting of a troponin of 0.000 ng/ml was not indicative of acute coronary syndrome. Marginally elevated D-dimer in the setting of worsening hypoxemia and tachycardia was concerning for PE, but CTA was non-significant for any PE or aortic pathology. TTE without pericardial effusion and ECG without PR segment depression or ST segment elevations, ruled out pericarditis. The initial chest CT raised concerns for multifocal pneumonia; however, infectious, and autoimmune workup were negative. Given the patient's history of vaping within the last 90 days, diffuse dense ground glass opacities on CT, absence of infectious etiology and absence of alternative diagnosis, the patient met the CDC Criteria for EVALI and started on treatment. Given the patient's clinical improvement and reduced oxygen requirements while on systemic steroids, flexible bronchoscopy was deferred.

Conclusion

While alternative causes of respiratory illness may be more prevalent, it is important to consider and assess for pulmonary illness associated with vaping, particularly in patients where no other cause can be clearly identified. Patients reporting respiratory complaints as well as gastrointestinal symptoms should be questioned about any recent e-cigarette to assess for possible EVALI given the appropriate clinical scenario, radiographic findings, and absence of pulmonary infectious etiologies and other causes progressive respiratory insufficiency.

References

1. Jonas AM, Raj R. Vaping-Related Acute Parenchymal Lung Injury: A Systematic Review. Chest. 2020 Oct;158(4):1555-1565. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Outbreak of Lung Injury Associated with the Use of E-Cigarette, or Vaping, Products. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_information/e-cigarettes/severe-lung-disease.html#latest-information (Accessed on May 06, 2020).
3. Schier JG, Meiman JG, Layden J, et al. Severe Pulmonary Disease Associated with Electronic-Cigarette-Product Use - Interim Guidance. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Sep 13;68(36):787-790. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Thota D, Latham E. Case report of electronic cigarettes possibly associated with eosinophilic pneumonitis in a previously healthy active-duty sailor. J Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;47(1):15-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Butt YM, Smith ML, Tazelaar HD, et al. Pathology of Vaping-Associated Lung Injury. N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 31;381(18):1780-1781. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6. Aberegg SK, Cirulis MM, Maddock SD, Freeman A, Keenan LM, Pirozzi CS, Raman SM, Schroeder J, Mann H, Callahan SJ. Clinical, Bronchoscopic, and Imaging Findings of e-Cigarette, or Vaping, Product Use-Associated Lung Injury Among Patients Treated at an Academic Medical Center. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2019176. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7. Layden JE, Ghinai I, Pray I, et al. Pulmonary Illness Related to E-Cigarette Use in Illinois and Wisconsin - Final Report. N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):903-916. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8. Maddock SD, Cirulis MM, Callahan SJ, Keenan LM, Pirozzi CS, Raman SM, Aberegg SK. Pulmonary Lipid-Laden Macrophages and Vaping. N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 10;381(15):1488-1489. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9. Davidson K, Brancato A, Heetderks P, Mansour W, Matheis E, Nario M, Rajagopalan S, Underhill B, Wininger J, Fox D. Outbreak of Electronic-Cigarette-Associated Acute Lipoid Pneumonia - North Carolina, July-August 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Sep 13;68(36):784-786. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10. Josef V, Tu G. Case report: the importance of screening for EVALI. Southwest J Pulm Crit Care. 2020;20(3)87-94. [CrossRef]

Cite as: Mahdi AA, Allahverdian C, Shahangian S. Electrotonic-Cigarette or Vaping Product Use Associated Lung Injury: Diagnosis of Exclusion. Southwest J Pulm Crit Care Sleep. 2022;24:96-100. doi: https://doi.org/10.13175/swjpccs026-22 PDF 

Diagnostic Challenges of Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia Post Naltrexone Injection Presenting During The COVID-19 Pandemic

Michelle Breuer

Abdulmonam Ali, MD

SSM Health

Mount Vernon, IL USA

Introduction

Acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP) is a rare respiratory illness that may present with nonspecific symptoms ranging in severity from cough and dyspnea to potentially fatal acute respiratory distress syndrome. Although the exact etiology of AEP is unknown, it is thought to be a hypersensitivity reaction that can be idiopathic or caused by various infections, inhalation exposures, and medications (1).  Here we present a rare case of AEP secondary to injectable naltrexone.

Case Presentation

A 45-year-old Caucasian male with a history of alcohol use disorder presented to the emergency room with a 3-day history of progressively worsening dyspnea and dry cough. The patient was a lifelong non-smoker with an unremarkable past medical history aside from alcohol abuse and obesity (BMI 41.64 kg/m²). He denied fever or chills, orthopnea, chest pain, or symptoms suggestive of paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea. He also denied any recent sick contacts, including exposure to COVID-19. Relevant history includes alcohol cessation 1 month before presentation. After 2 weeks of cessation, he received his first injection of naltrexone (Vivitrol®) as part of alcohol relapse prevention. Physical exam was notable for an initial SpO₂ of 69% on room air, sinus tachycardia at a rate of 121 bpm, and obesity. Chest examination exhibited decreased air entry with bilateral fine crackles on auscultation. No skin rashes or peripheral edema were appreciated, and the remaining physical exam was within normal limits. The patient was started on supplemental oxygen (6 liters/minute nasal cannula to maintain SpO2 above 90%).

Workup was performed and chest x-ray showed diffuse bilateral pulmonary infiltrates (Figure 1), hence, the patient was started on empiric antibiotic and steroid therapy.

Figure 1. Chest X-ray showing bilateral ground-glass opacities.

SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing was performed twice due to high clinical suspicion of COVID-19 infection (the patient was seen during the Coronavirus pandemic). Both SARS-CoV-2 tests were negative as well as the rest of the respiratory viral panel. CBC was significant for leukocytosis with an absolute peripheral eosinophil count of 0.49 x 10⁹ cells/L. Bloodwork also revealed mildly elevated troponin, d-dimer, and LDH. However, electrocardiogram showed no significant ST changes and Computerized Tomography (CT) angiography chest showed no evidence of pulmonary embolism but confirmed the chest x-ray findings of diffuse bilateral ground-glass opacities with anterolateral subpleural parenchymal sparing (Figure 2).

Figure 2. CTA chest (axial view, lung window) showing diffuse ground-glass opacities.

An echocardiogram showed an ejection fraction of 60% and normal left ventricular diastolic function. Moderate right ventricular (RV) dilation with reduced systolic function was reported and the peak RV pressure was estimated at 39 mmHg. Extensive blood testing for connective tissue disease was negative for ANCA, CCP, ANA, and cryoglobulins. Immunoglobulin E (IgE) level was within normal limits at 14KU/L (reference range < 214 KU/L).  Infectious disease serology was negative for mycoplasma, strongyloides, coccidioides, and aspergillus. HIV and hepatitis screening were also negative. Bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed and was significant for 27% eosinophils, 42% lymphocytes, 25% monocytes, 6% neutrophils (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) showing increased numbers of eosinophils.

BAL culture remained negative including mycobacterial and fungal cultures. BAL testing for Pneumocystis Jirovecii was negative as well. BAL cytology showed benign bronchial epithelial cells and inflammatory cells. No parasites were seen in BAL and fungal staining was negative.

The constellation of the above clinical, radiological, and laboratory findings was highly suggestive of acute eosinophilic pneumonia diagnosis. The patient’s methylprednisolone dose was increased to 125mg every 8 hours. Due to high FiO2 requirements and poor pulmonary reserve, the patient remained intubated after his bronchoscopy procedure. Over the following 48 hours, FiO₂ requirements improved significantly and his repeat chest x-ray showed almost complete resolution of the pulmonary infiltrates. The patient was successfully extubated to 2 liters of oxygen via nasal cannula on the third day.  Supplemental oxygen was eventually weaned off to room air. There wasn’t significant desaturation observed with the exercise trial. He was discharged home on a gradually tapering dose of oral steroids over 6 weeks. The patient was later seen at the pulmonary clinic for a follow-up visit. He was doing well and denied any significant respiratory symptoms. A follow-up chest x-ray was within normal limits (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Chest x-ray upon follow-up.

Discussion 

Acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP) is defined by rapid eosinophilic infiltration of the lung tissue, resulting in impaired gas exchange. Presenting symptoms are nonspecific and may include cough, progressive dyspnea, chest pain, and fever (2). Chest imaging of patients with AEP shows diffuse bilateral parenchymal infiltrates. Diagnosis can be made in the appropriate clinical and radiological context, with BAL showing at least 25% eosinophils on the fluid differential, and with no other identifiable causes (1).

The pathogenesis of AEP is not completely understood; however, it is hypothesized to involve a hypersensitivity reaction in patients with genetic susceptibility (3,4). AEP can be associated with many identifiable causes including cigarette smoke most notably, as well as other inhalants, infections, and medications. Although antibiotics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are among the more common inciting medications, injectable naltrexone has been implicated in several case reports (3,5,6,7).

The clinical presentations of AEP can mimic SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, community-acquired pneumonia, or ARDS; hence, a high index of clinical suspicion is essential to avoid delay in therapy. A confident diagnosis of AEP can usually be made without a lung biopsy in patients who meet the following criteria (8):

1) acute onset of febrile respiratory manifestations (≤ 1-month duration before consultation).

2) bilateral diffuse opacities on chest radiography.

3) hypoxemia, with PaO₂ on room air<60 mm Hg, and/or PaO₂/FiO₂≤300 mm Hg, and/or oxygen saturation on room air<90%.4) lung eosinophilia, with >25% eosinophils on BAL differential cell count (or eosinophilic pneumonia at lung biopsy).

5) absence of known causes of AEP, including drugs, infections, asthma, or atopic disease.

In our case, the patient has met most of the suggested criteria for diagnosing AEP in addition to the presence of a triggering factor (a clear temporal relationship between the development of symptoms and the recent naltrexone injection). However, we met with a few obstacles before making the diagnosis of AEP.  During these unprecedented times, any patient presenting with acute hypoxic respiratory failure, and/or ground-glass opacities (both are classic for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia as well as AEP) must go through an additional screening process to rule out COVID-19, including contact and airborne infection isolation precautions in addition to the standard precautions and SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing.  

On the other hand, several recent reports of AEP presumably triggered by SARS-CoV-2 infection had been described (9-10), which was another factor that contributed to making the diagnosis of AEP more challenging in his case and kept COVID-19 high on the differential diagnosis list. Furthermore, our patient received steroids on the initial presentation which likely affected the accuracy of the total eosinophilic counts in the BAL.

AEP has a higher likelihood than chronic eosinophil pneumonia of presenting with more severe symptoms and has a greater potential of rapid progression to respiratory failure. One review study reported 30-80% of AEP patients required intensive care unit admission and another case review noted 20% of AEP patients required mechanical ventilation (4,11). Treatment includes supportive care, recognition and avoidance of identifiable triggers, and systemic corticosteroids. Most patients rapidly improve with prompt corticosteroid treatment and experience complete recovery (1,3). Relapse of AEP rarely occurs (4).

Numerous conditions can cause pulmonary eosinophilia that needs to be differentiated from AEP. Different classifications have been suggested, but we will list the broad categories and most common etiologies including chronic eosinophilic pneumonia, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA, previously known as Churg-Strauss), drug and toxin-induced eosinophilic lung disease, helminthic, and fungal infection-related eosinophilic lung diseases, idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome, neoplasms, interstitial lung disease, coccidioidomycosis, tuberculosis, and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis.

In addition to AEP, several conditions are associated with elevated BAL eosinophils greater than 25%.  These conditions include chronic eosinophilic pneumonia, EGPA, tropical pulmonary eosinophilia.  Other conditions causing BAL eosinophilia, but less than 25%, include connective tissue disease, drug-induced pneumonitis, fungal pneumonia, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis, sarcoidosis.

Finally, multiple medications are implicated in drug-induced AEP, however, naltrexone is still not well recognized as a potential cause.  In a recent retrospective review, naltrexone was not included in the medication list compiled (11).

Conclusion

Injectable naltrexone, a long-acting opioid antagonist, is used for the treatment of opioid and alcohol dependence. Although rare, the use of injectable naltrexone is associated with the potentially fatal side effect of AEP. Since AEP shares many clinical attributes with other causes of acute lung injury, including community-acquired pneumonia and SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, it can be easily overlooked. Therefore, having an accurate history and an appropriate index of suspicion is important for early detection and proper management (3).

References

1. De Giacomi F, Vassallo R, Yi ES, Ryu JH. Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia. Causes, Diagnosis, and Management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Mar 15;197(6):728-736. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Katz U, Shoenfeld Y. Pulmonary eosinophilia. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2008 Jun;34(3):367-71. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Mears M, McCoy K, Qiao X. Eosinophilic Pneumonia and Extended-Release Injectable Naltrexone. Chest. 2021;160(4): A1676 [Abstract]. [CrossRef]
4. Suzuki Y, Suda T. Eosinophilic pneumonia: A review of the previous literature, causes, diagnosis, and management. Allergol Int. 2019 Oct;68(4):413-419. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Horsley R, Wesselius LJ. June 2107 Pulmonary Case of the Month. Southwest J Pulm Crit Care. 2017;14(6):255-61. [CrossRef]  
6. Esposito A, Lau B. Saved by the BAL: A Case of Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia After Methyl-Naltrexone Injection. Chest. 2019;156(4):A2210 [Abstract]. [CrossRef]
7. Korpole PR, Al-Bacha S, Hamadeh S. A Case for Biopsy: Injectable Naltrexone-Induced Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia. Cureus. 2020 Sep 3;12(9):e10221. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8. Philit F, Etienne-Mastroïanni B, Parrot A, Guérin C, Robert D, Cordier JF. Idiopathic acute eosinophilic pneumonia: a study of 22 patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov 1;166(9):1235-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9. Araújo M, Correia S, Lima AL, Costa M, Neves I. SARS-CoV-2 as a trigger of eosinophilic pneumonia. Pulmonology. 2022 Jan-Feb;28(1):62-64. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10. Murao K, Saito A, Kuronuma K, Fujiya Y, Takahashi S, Chiba H. Acute eosinophilic pneumonia accompanied with COVID-19: a case report. Respirol Case Rep. 2020 Nov 16;8(9):e00683. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11. Bartal C, Sagy I, Barski L. Drug-induced eosinophilic pneumonia: A review of 196 case reports. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jan;97(4):e9688. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12. Salahuddin M, Anjum F, Cherian SV. Pulmonary Eosinophilia. 2021 Dec 8. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan–. [PubMed]

Cite as: Breuer M, Ali A. Diagnostic Challenges of Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia Post Naltrexone Injection Presenting During The COVID-19 Pandemic. Southwest J Pulm Crit Care Sleep. 2022;24(2):26-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.13175/swjpccs002-22 PDF 

March 2021 Pulmonary Case of the Month: Transfer for ECMO Evaluation

Nicholas G. Blackstone, MD

April Olson, MD

Angela Gibbs, MD

Bhupinder Natt, MD

Janet Campion, MD

University of Arizona College of Medicine – Tucson

Tucson, AZ USA

History of present illness

A 31-year-old male fire fighter with a history of recurrent “atypical pneumonia”, environmental and drug allergies, nasal polyps, asthma, and Crohns disease (not on immunosuppressants) was transferred from an outside hospital for management of acute hypoxic respiratory failure with peripheral eosinophilia. Prior to admission he reported a 2-week history of worsening dyspnea, productive cough and wheezing, prompting an urgent care visit where he was prescribed amoxicillin-clavulanate for suspected community acquired pneumonia. Despite multiple days on this medication, his symptoms significantly worsened until he was unable to lie flat without coughing or wheezing. He was ultimately admitted to an outside hospital where his labs were notable for a leukocytosis to 22,000 and peripheral eosinophilia with an absolute eosinophil count of 9700 cells/microL. His blood cultures and urine cultures were negative, and a radiograph of the chest demonstrated bilateral nodular infiltrates. With these imaging findings combined with the peripheral eosinophilia there was a concern for Coccidioidomycosis infection and he was subsequentially started on empirical fluconazole in addition to ceftriaxone and azithromycin. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed revealing 80% eosinophils, 14% polymorphic nuclear cells (PMNs), 4% monocytes and 2% lymphocytes, no pathogens were identified. The patient’s clinical status continued to decline despite antimicrobial therapy, and he was intubated for refractory hypoxia. At this point, the patient was transferred to our hospital for further care.

What is the most likely diagnosis in this patient? (Click on the correct answer to be directed to the second of four pages.)

1. Acute asthma exacerbation
2. Bacterial pneumonia
3. Coccidioidomycosis pneumonia
4. Eosinophilic pneumonia
5. Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever

Cite as: Blackstone NG, Olson A, Gibbs A, Natt B, Campion J. March 2021 Pulmonary Case of the Month: Transfer for ECMO Evaluation. Southwest J Pulm Crit Care. 2021;22(3):69-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.13175/swjpcc069-20 PDF

February 2018 Pulmonary Case of the Month

Lewis J. Wesselius, MD

Department of Pulmonary Medicine

Mayo Clinic Arizona

Scottsdale, AZ USA

History of Present Illness

A 75-year-old woman was diagnosed with a thymic carcinoid tumor in April, 2015 (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Representative image from the preoperative CT scan performed in April 2015 showing an anterior mediastinal mass (arrow).

This was treated with surgical resection followed by radiation therapy.

She began having cough and dyspnea 1 to 2 months later and in August, 2015 had a thoracic CT scan of her chest (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Representative image in lung windows from the second thoracic CT scan performed in August 2015.

Which of the following are true? (Click on the correct answer to proceed to the second of six pages)

1. Bronchoscopy should be performed
2. She should be given an empiric course of antibiotics
3. The most like diagnosis is radiation pneumonitis
4. 1 and 3
5. All of the above

Cite as: Wesselius LJ. February 2018 pulmonary case of the month. Southwest J Pulm Crit Care. 2018;16(2):55-61. doi: https://doi.org/10.13175/swjpcc020-18 PDF 

August 2016 Pulmonary Case of the Month

Anjuli M. Brighton, MB, BCh, BAO

Kathryn E. Williams, MB, BCh, BAO

Lewis J. Wesselius, MD

Pulmonary Department

Mayo Clinic Arizona

Scottsdale, AZ USA

Pulmonary Case of the Month CME Information

Members of the Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and California Thoracic Societies and the Mayo Clinic are able to receive 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™ for each case they complete. Completion of an evaluation form is required to receive credit and a link is provided on the last panel of the activity. 

0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™

Estimated time to complete this activity: 0.25 hours

Lead Author(s): Anjuli M. Brighton, MB.  All Faculty, CME Planning Committee Members, and the CME Office Reviewers have disclosed that they do not have any relevant financial relationships with commercial interests that would constitute a conflict of interest concerning this CME activity.

Learning Objectives:
As a result of this activity I will be better able to:

1. Correctly interpret and identify clinical practices supported by the highest quality available evidence.
2. Will be better able to establsh the optimal evaluation leading to a correct diagnosis for patients with pulmonary, critical care and sleep disorders.
3. Will improve the translation of the most current clinical information into the delivery of high quality care for patients.
4. Will integrate new treatment options in discussing available treatment alternatives for patients with pulmonary, critical care and sleep related disorders.

Learning Format: Case-based, interactive online course, including mandatory assessment questions (number of questions varies by case). Please also read the Technical Requirements.

CME Sponsor: University of Arizona College of Medicine at Banner University Medical Center Tucson

Current Approval Period: January 1, 2015-December 31, 2016

Financial Support Received: None

History of Present Illness

The patient is 54-year-old man with type 1 diabetes mellitus admitted for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). He complained of somnolence, nausea and vomiting and right foot pain. He had been admitted 2 weeks earlier for right foot gangrene. He had been receiving daptomycin for his right foot gangrene.

PMH, SH and FH

He had a previous history of osteomyelitis, perianal abscess, maxillary abscess, Candida esophagitis, transient ischemic attack, and peripheral vascular disease. He had previous amputations along with thrombectomy/ embolectomy/bypass. He was a former Marine and construction worker with ongoing cigarette use. Family history was noncontributory.

Physical Examination

• Febrile to 38.2ºC
• Crackles bilaterally
• Transmetatarsal stump with dry gangrene

Radiography

An admission chest x-ray was performed (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Admission portable AP of chest.

Which of the following are appropriate at this time? (Click on the correct answer to proceed to the second of four panels)

1. Blood and wound cultures
2. Empiric antibiotics including coverage for Staphylococcus aureus
3. Intravenous insulin and fluids
4. Serially monitor renal function and electrolytes
5. All of the above

Cite as: Brighton AM, Williams KE, Wesselius LJ. August 2016 pulmonary case of the month. Southwest J Pulm Crit Care. 2016;13(2):40-5. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13175/swjpcc070-16  PDF 

April 2016 Pulmonary Case of the Month

Lewis J. Wesselius, MD

Rodrigo Cartin-Ceba, MD 

Department of Pulmonary Medicine

Mayo Clinic Arizona

Scottsdale, AZ

Pulmonary Case of the Month CME Information

Members of the Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and California Thoracic Societies and the Mayo Clinic are able to receive 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™ for each case they complete. Completion of an evaluation form is required to receive credit and a link is provided on the last panel of the activity. 

0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™

Estimated time to complete this activity: 0.25 hours

Lead Author(s): Lewis J. Wesselius, MD.  All Faculty, CME Planning Committee Members, and the CME Office Reviewers have disclosed that they do not have any relevant financial relationships with commercial interests that would constitute a conflict of interest concerning this CME activity.

Learning Objectives:
As a result of this activity I will be better able to:

1. Correctly interpret and identify clinical practices supported by the highest quality available evidence.
2. Will be better able to establsh the optimal evaluation leading to a correct diagnosis for patients with pulmonary, critical care and sleep disorders.
3. Will improve the translation of the most current clinical information into the delivery of high quality care for patients.
4. Will integrate new treatment options in discussing available treatment alternatives for patients with pulmonary, critical care and sleep related disorders.

Learning Format: Case-based, interactive online course, including mandatory assessment questions (number of questions varies by case). Please also read the Technical Requirements.

CME Sponsor: University of Arizona College of Medicine at Banner University Medical Center Tucson

Current Approval Period: January 1, 2015-December 31, 2016

Financial Support Received: None

History of Present Illness

The patient is a 75-year-old woman who presented with a chest mass incidentally found on chest x-ray. She was asymptomatic

Past Medical History, Social History and Family History

She has no significant past medical history and has never smoked. Family history is noncontributory.

Physical Examination

Physical examination was unremarkable.

Radiography

A thoracic CT scan was performed (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Representative thoracic CT scan in soft tissue windows showing  a mass (arrow).

Which of the following are possible causes of the mass? (Click on the correct answer to proceed to the second of four panels)

1. Lymphoma
2. Teratoma
3. Thymoma
4. Thyroid carcinoma
5. All of the above 

Cite as: Wesselius LJ, Cartin-Ceba R. April 2016 pulmonary case of the month. Southwest J Pulm Crit Care. 2016 Apr;12(4):126-9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13175/swjpcc032-16 PDF 

June 2013 Pulmonary Case of the Month: Diagnosis Makes a Difference

Lewis J. Wesselius, MD¹

Henry D. Tazelaar, MD²

Departments of Pulmonary Medicine¹ and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology²

Mayo Clinic Arizona

Scottsdale, AZ

History of Present Illness

A 64 year old man from Southern Arizona was referred for a second opinion on a diagnosis of chronic eosinophilic pneumonia that was poorly responsive to corticosteroid therapy. The patient first became ill February 2012 with cough and congestion.  His wife was ill at the same time. Both were treated with antibiotics. His wife improved but he never fully recovered with ongoing symptoms of cough and some dyspnea.

He was admitted to another hospital in August 2012 due to worsening shortness of breath and pulmonary infiltrates on chest x-ray. During this admission he underwent bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) that demonstrated 78% eosinophils. A video-assisted thorascopic (VATs) lung biopsy was done and the patient was diagnosed with chronic eosinophilic pneumonia. He was begun on therapy with high dose prednisone (80 mg/day) but had only slight improvement in symptoms.

He was followed by a pulmonologist and continued on prednisone who questioned the possible development of pulmonary fibrosis. Earlier this year he was started on mycophenolate mofetil and the dose was increased to 1000 mg bid while the prednisone was tapered to 5 mg every other day. He was also being treated with fluticasone/salmeterol 250/50 twice a day. The patient continues to have dyspnea with limited activity. His last pulmonary function testing was done in December 2012. At that time his forced vital capacity (FVC) was 51% of predicted and his diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) was 40% of predicted.

PMH, SH, FH

He had a history of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and had undergone an uvulopharyngoplasty (UPPP). There was also a history of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and he had a prior Nissen fundoplication. He had a history of osteoarthritis and had undergone a right shoulder replacement.

He had a remote smoking history, a history of modest alcohol use, but no history of using recreational drugs.  He worked as an airline pilot.

His present medications included mycophenolate mofetil 1000 mg twice a day, prednisone 5 mg every other day, voriconazole 200 mg daily (started after BAL showed a few colonies of Aspergillus), and fluticasone/salmeterol 250/50 twice a day.

Physical Examination

Blood pressure 134/88 mm Hg.  Resting oxygen saturation 96%.

Chest:  bibasilar crackles but no wheezes.

Cardiovascular: the heart had a regular rhythm but no murmur.

Extremities: no clubbing or edema.

The remainder of the physical examination was unremarkable.

Chest Radiography

His chest x-ray is shown in figure 1.

Figure 1. Initial chest x-ray.

Which of the following diseases has/have been associated with increased eosinophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid?

1. Interstitial lung diseases
2. Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-associated pneumonia
3. Idiopathic eosinophilic pneumonia
4. Drug-induced lung disease
5. All of the above

Reference as: Wesselius WJ, Tazelaar HD. June 2013 pulmonary case of the month: diagnosis makes a difference. Southwest J Pulm Crit Care. 2013;6(6):247-54. PDF 

September 2012 Pulmonary Case of the Month: The War on Drugs

Sudheer Penupolu, MD

Philip J. Lyng, MD

Lewis J. Wesselius, MD

Department of Pulmonary Medicine

Mayo Clinic Arizona

Scottsdale, AZ

History of Present Illness

A 69 year old woman was seen with a three day history of nonproductive cough and shortness of breath.

PMH, SH and FH

She has a past history of atrial fibrillation and hypothyroidism.

Her present medications include:

• Diltiazem
• Amiodarone
• Aspirin
• Levothyroxine
• Multi vitamins

There is a 20 pack-year smoking history but she quit in 1998. She is employed as a law school professor.

Physical Examination

Her physical examination is normal.

Chest X-ray

Her admission chest x-ray is shown in Figure 1.

An electrocardiogram showed normal sinus rhythm.

Which of the following is the most likely cause of the patient’s clinical picture?

1. Viral bronchitis
2. Exacerbation of COPD
3. Pneumonia
4. Congestive heart failure
5. Drug reaction

Reference as: Penupolu S, Lyng PJ, Wesselius LJ. September 2012 pulmonary case of the month: the war on drugs. Southwest J Pulm Crit Care 2012;5:107-14. (Click here for a PDF version of the article)

August 2012 Pulmonary Case of the Month

All Eosinophilia Is Not Asthma

Lewis J. Wesselius, MD

Departments of Pulmonary Medicine

Mayo Clinic Arizona

Scottsdale, AZ

History of Present Illness

A 73 year old man was seen with a one month history of shortness of breath. He dated this to an emergency room visit for an arm injury for which he had a DPT vaccination. Previously, he had been able to swim regularly, but he is now unable to swim due to worsening dyspnea. He also had some cough that was nonproductive.

PMH, SH and FH

He has a past medical history of coronary artery disease with prior stenting of his right and left anterior descending artery in 2010. He also has a history of hypertension, dysplipidemia, a carotid endarterectomy and a single seizure after a corneal transplant.

His present medications include:

• Atorvastatin
• Lisinopril
• Metoprolol
• Warfarin

He has a minimal smoking history and denied use of alcohol, drugs or unusual exposures. 

Physical Examination

His vitals signs were normal and he was afebrile but he was receiving supplemental oxygen at 3 lpm.

Chest examination revealed bilateral crackles but no wheezes.

Cardiovascular examination showed a regular rhythm with a Grade 2/6 systolic ejection murmur.

He had no clubbing or edema.

The remainder of the physical examination was either normal or noncontributory.

Chest X-ray

His admission chest x-ray is shown in Figure 1.

 Figure 1. Admission chest x-ray showing the PA (Panel A) and lateral (Panel B).

Which of the following are possible causes of the patient’s clinical picture?

1. Coccidioidomycosis (Valley Fever)
2. Allergic reaction to the DPT vaccination
3. Pulmonary edema
4. A + C
5. All of the above

Reference as: Wesselius LJ. August 2012 pulmonary case of the month: all eosinophilia is not asthma. Southwest J Pulm Crit Care 2012;5:58-64. (Click here for a PDF version of the case presentation)

Treatment of Coccidioidomycosis-associated Eosinophilic Pneumonia with Corticosteroids

Joshua Malo, MD

Yuval Raz, MD 

Linda Snyder, MD

Kenneth Knox, MD

University of Arizona Medical Center

Department of Medicine

Section of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine

Tucson, AZ 85724

Abstract

Pulmonary coccidioidomycosis is a common cause of community-acquired pneumonia in endemic areas of the southwestern United States. The clinical spectrum of this disease ranges from an asymptomatic presentation to severe disease with ARDS and hypoxemic respiratory failure. Despite evidence supporting the use of corticosteroids for severe pulmonary disease in other fungal infections, there is currently no established role for this therapy in coccidioidomycosis infections. Peripheral eosinophilia is a common feature of coccidioidomycosis; however, pulmonary eosinophilia is rarely reported. In the setting of pulmonary eosinophilia of other etiologies, corticosteroid therapy has been demonstrated to have a role in reducing the inflammatory response and leading to a more rapid resolution of hypoxemic respiratory failure. We report a case of a patient with primary pulmonary coccidioidomycosis complicated by severe pulmonary eosinophilia that demonstrated rapid improvement after the initiation of corticosteroid therapy.

Case Report

A 71-year-old man presented to the emergency room in Tucson, Arizona with a one-week history of fever, cough, and malaise. The patient’s symptoms began while returning from a trip to northern California. A chest radiograph ordered by the primary care physician demonstrated a right upper lobe consolidation (Figure 1) and azithromycin was prescribed. Fevers persisted along with worsening cough over the next three days, and the patient presented for further evaluation.

Figure 1. Admission radiograph demonstrating right upper lobe airspace disease

Medical history was remarkable for viral cardiomyopathy requiring placement of an ICD after an episode of sudden cardiac death in 2006. An episode of S. bovis bacteremia occurred 4 months prior to the current presentation and was treated with a course of cefazolin. There is no known personal or family history of atopic disease. There is no history of tobacco use or significant occupational exposures. The patient had been living in Arizona during the preceding year and had no other recent travel history, dust, or environmental exposures.

On physical exam, temperature was 38.8°C and pulse oximetry saturation was 90 percent on room air. The patient was in moderate respiratory distress with rales auscultated in the right upper lung zone. Subsequent laboratory examination revealed a PaO2 of 69 mmHg on 4 liters-per-minute of oxygen via nasal cannula. A metabolic panel showed elevated transaminases and his initial leukocyte count was 11.8 x 10³/mL with differential including 5% eosinophils.

The patient was admitted to the medical ward and treated with vancomycin, cefepime, and moxifloxacin for pneumonia caused by a potentially resistant organism. Fluconazole was started on the third hospital day for empiric treatment of primary pulmonary coccidioidomycosis. A CT angiogram of the chest showed bilateral multilobar pneumonia (Figure 2).

Figure 2. CT angiogram of the chest demonstrating multilobar consolidation of the right lung

The patient deteriorated and required intubation for severe hypoxemia two days later. A bronchoalveolar lavage revealed Coccidioides spherules on cytological examination. Liposomal amphotericin B was initiated, which led to the development of oliguric renal failure necessitating hemodialysis. Initial Coccidioides serology was negative, however sputum and BAL cultures demonstrated C. immitis. Despite antifungal therapy his pulmonary status worsened with progressive bilateral pulmonary infiltrates and worsening hypoxemic respiratory failure (Figure 3).

Figure 3. CXR demonstrating progressive bilateral alveolar opacities consistent with ARDS.

In addition, he had a steadily increasing peripheral eosinophilia reaching a maximum of 40 percent with a leukocyte count of 14.8 x 10³/mL despite the absence of any signs of disseminated coccidioidomycosis. A repeat BAL again showed Coccidioides spherules and eosinophils of 40 and 56 percent from the right middle lobe and lingula, respectively. Methylprednisolone 40mg IV three times daily was started with a decline in blood eosinophils to one percent within 24 hours. Chest radiographs and A-a gradient rapidly improved over the next 3 days leading to successful extubation. The patient was transitioned to oral fluconazole and prednisone and discharged from the hospital in good condition two weeks later.

At the follow-up six weeks after initial presentation, he remains on fluconazole and prednisone 15mg daily with no signs of disseminated coccidioidomycosis and is continuing a gradual reduction of prednisone dosage.

Discussion

Coccidioidomycosis is caused by either of 2 species of the dimorphic fungus Coccidioides. Endemic regions are present in North and South America, with the majority of cases within the United States arising in Arizona and California. Although peripheral eosinophilia is a commonly reported finding (1), pulmonary eosinophilia has rarely been described.

Acute eosinophilic pneumonias may be idiopathic or a secondary inflammatory response to various infections or environmental exposures. In regions where endemic fungal infections are common, differentiating between eosinophilic pneumonias of idiopathic versus infectious etiology is vital in order to avoid inappropriate therapy and its adverse consequences. A review of the literature concerning pulmonary coccidioidomycosis and concurrent pulmonary eosinophilia demonstrates only 9 prior case reports. Corticosteroid therapy was used for treatment of the pulmonary eosinophilia in only 3 of these cases, 2 of which resulted in death from disseminated coccidioidal infection (1-3). One case ended in spontaneous resolution of disease without antifungals or corticosteroids leading the authors to suggest a conservative approach with corticosteroids due to the risk for dissemination (4).

In our case, there was progressive clinical deterioration despite ten days of treatment with appropriate antifungal regimen, leading to our decision to treat with corticosteroids. The immediate decrease in peripheral eosinophilia in conjunction with the rapid clinical improvement leads us to the conclusion that corticosteroids were beneficial in the resolution of his acute respiratory failure. The clinical response observed is similar to that expected in idiopathic acute eosinophilic pneumonia which supports the notion that the eosinophilic response, as opposed to the primary infection, was primarily responsible for our patient’s severe hypoxemia.

There remains a risk for disseminated disease. In the cases cited in which patients died of dissemination, antifungal therapy preceding corticosteroid therapy was not described. Due to the risk of underlying pulmonary coccidioidomycosis in endemic regions, corticosteroid therapy for eosinophilic pneumonia should only be considered in the setting of severe hypoxemic respiratory failure and once adequate antifungal therapy has been initiated.

According to recent guidelines there is no role for corticosteroid therapy in the treatment of coccidioidomycosis due to a lack of convincing data for efficacy and safety (5). There is precedent for treating severe pulmonary disease caused by other fungal infections, such as histoplasmosis and blastomycosis, with corticosteroids. We suggest that there is a role for the use of corticosteroid therapy in the setting of progressive respiratory failure due to coccidioidomycosis with associated pulmonary eosinophilia that has failed conventional antifungal therapy.

References

1. Echols RM, Palmer DL, Long GW. Tissue eosinophilia in human coccidioidomycosis. Rev Infect Dis 1982;4:656–664.
2. Lombard CM, Tazelaar HD, Krasne DL. Pulmonary eosinophilia in coccidioidal infections. Chest 1987;5:734–736
3. Swartz J, Stoller JK. Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia Complicating Coccidioides immitis Pneumonia: A Case Report and Literature Review. Respiration 2009;77:102–106
4. Whitlock WL, Dietrich RA, Tenholder MF. Acute eosinophilic pneumonia (letter). N Engl J Med 1990;322:635
5. Limper AH, Knox KS, Sarosi GA, et al. Treatment of fungal infections in adult pulmonary and critical care patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183:96–128

The authors report no conflicts of interest

Address correspondence to:     Joshua Malo, MD

                                             University of Arizona Medical Center

                                             Department of Medicine    

                                             Section of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical

                                             Care and Sleep Medicine

                                             Tucson, AZ 85724

                                             E-mail: jmalo@deptofmed.arizona.edu

Reference as: Malo J, Raz Y, Snyder L, Knox K. Treatment of coccidioidomycosis-associated eosinophilic pneumonia with corticosteroids. Southwest J Pulm Crit Care 2012;4:61-66. (Click here for a PDF version of the manuscript)