Imaging

Those who care for patients with pulmonary, critical care or sleep disorders rely heavily on chest radiology and pathology to determine diagnoses. The Southwest Journal of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep publishes case-based articles with characteristic chest imaging and related pathology.

The editor of this section will oversee and coordinate the publication of a core of the most important chest imaging topics. In doing so, they encourage the submission of unsolicited manuscripts. It cannot be overemphasized that both radiologic and pathologic images must be of excellent quality. As a rule, 600 DPI is sufficient for radiographic and pathologic images. Taking pictures of plain chest radiographs and CT scans with a digital camera is strongly discouraged. The figures should be cited in the text and numbered consecutively. The stain used for pathology specimens and magnification should be mentioned in the figure legend. Those who care for patients with pulmonary, critical care or sleep disorders rely heavily on chest radiology and pathology to determine diagnoses. The Southwest Journal of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep publishes case-based articles with characteristic chest imaging and related pathology. The editor of this section will oversee and coordinate the publication of a core of the most important chest imaging topics. In doing so, they encourage the submission of unsolicited manuscripts. It cannot be overemphasized that both radiologic and pathologic images must be of excellent quality. As a rule, 600 DPI is sufficient for radiographic and pathologic images. Taking pictures of plain chest radiographs and CT scans with a digital camera is strongly discouraged. The figures should be cited in the text and numbered consecutively. The stain used for pathology specimens and magnification should be mentioned in the figure legend.

Rick Robbins, M.D. Rick Robbins, M.D.

Medical Image of the Week: Medical Administrative Growth

Figure 1. Growth of administrators compared to physicians 1970-2010 (used with permission of David Himmelstein).

It is generally agreed that healthcare costs are too high in the US. Although there has been considerable finger pointing, there is little doubt that administrative costs are far outpacing other healthcare costs. In ground-breaking work published in 1991, Woolhandler and Himmelstein (1) found that US administrative health care costs increased 37% between 1983 and 1987. They estimated these costs accounted for nearly a quarter of all health care expenditures. They followed their 83-87 report by examining data from 1999 (2). US administrative costs had risen to 31% of US health care expenditures. Himmelstein now estimates that administrative costs may now account for up to 40% of healthcare costs (Robbins RA, personal communication). The trend is perhaps best illustrated by Figure 1 showing growth of administrators compared to physicians from 1970-2010 (3).

Richard A. Robbins MD1 and Bhupinder Natt MD2

1Phoenix Pulmonary and Critical Care Research and Education Foundation, Gilbert, AZ USA

2University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ USA

References

  1. Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU. The deteriorating administrative efficiency of the US health care system. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(18):1253-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Woolhandler S, Campbell T, Himmelstein DU. Costs of health care administration in the United States and Canada. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(8):768-75. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bureau of Labor Statistics. NCHS. Himmelstein and Woolhandler analysis of current population survey. Available at: http://www.pnhp.org/ (accessed 7/9/18).

Cite as: Robbins RA, Natt B. Medical image of the week: Medical administrative growth. Southwest J Pulm Crit Care. 2018;17(1):35. doi: https://doi.org/10.13175/swjpcc087-18 PDF 

Read More