Medical Image of the Week: Atypical Deep Sulcus Sign

Figure 1.  Chest X-ray showing hyper inflated lungs with no clear evidence of pneumothorax.

Figure 2. Atypical deep sulcus sign on the left side.

Figure 3. Complete resolution of left sided pneumothorax after chest tube placement.

The deep sulcus sign is a radiolucent lateral sulcus where the chest wall meets the diaphragm. The costophrenic angle is abnormally deepened when the pleural air collects laterally, producing the deep sulcus sign (1). Here, we present a 42-year-old man with a history of asthma who was admitted with status asthmaticus requiring intubation. On hospital day 3, the patient developed subcutaneous emphysema surrounding his entire neck and extending into left side of the chest wall. Chest X-ray after this episode showed an atypical deep sulcus sign (Figure 2) concerning for left sided pneumothorax that was also confirmed by bedside ultrasound. A surgical chest tube was placed immediately and a repeat chest X-ray (Figure 3) showed complete resolution of the pneumothorax and the deep sulcus sign. In critically ill patients where it is difficult to obtain an upright film, it is important to pay attention to the costophrenic angles when concern for pneumothorax arises. In a supine film, a deep sulcus sign may be the only indication of a pneumothorax because air collects anteriorly and basally within the nondependent portions of the pleural space, as opposed to the apex when the patient is upright (2).

Hasan Ali MD¹, Huthayfa Ateeli MBBS², Bhupinder Natt MD FACP², Sachin Chaudhary MD².

¹Department of Medicine and ²Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep and Allergy

University of Arizona College of Medicine

Tucson, AZ USA

References

1. Kim HK, Park CY, Cho HM. Deep sulcus sign. Trauma Image & Procedure. 2016;1(1):12-3. [CrossRef]
2. Liu SY, Tsai IT, Yang PJ. Pneumothorax and deep sulcus sign. QJM. 2016;109(9):621-2. [CrossRef] [PubMed]  

Cite as: Ali H, Ateeli H, Natt B, Chaudhary S. Medical image of the week: atypical deep sulcus sign. Southwest J Pulm Crit Care. 2018;16(4):224-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.13175/swjpcc044-18 PDF 

Medical Image of the Week: Hepatic Hydrothorax

Figure 1. Panel A: Chest x-ray showing right pleural effusion. Panel B: Coronal view of the thoracic CT scan in soft tissue windows showing right pleural effusion.

Figure 2. Nuclear scan after intraperitoneal injection of technetium 99mTc albumin aggregated (99mTc-MAA). After less than one hour most of the tracer migrated into the right hemithorax consistent with hepatic hydrothorax.

A 63 year-old woman, with known alcoholic liver cirrhosis, esophageal varices with history of banding presented to an outside hospital with progressive shortness of breath, and was found to have a large right transudative pleural effusion. The patient underwent 2 diagnostic and therapeutic thoracenteses within 3 days, removing 1100 ml and 1500 ml respectively. No ascites was present. At the time of admission the patient had recurrent right effusion (Figure 1). Abdominal ultrasound showed minimal free intrabdominal fluid and she had signs of third spacing on her lower extremities. The patient underwent intraperitoneal injection of Technetium 99mTc albumin aggregated (99mTc-MAA). After less than one hour most of the tracer migrated into the right hemithorax consistent with hepatic hydrothorax (Figure 2).

While the exact mechanism involved in the development of hepatic hydrothorax is incompletely understood, it probably results from the passage of ascitic fluid from the peritoneal into the pleural cavity through small diaphragmatic defects. These are typically < 1 cm (and may be microscopic) and are generally located in the tendinous portion of the diaphragm. The negative intrathoracic pressure generated during inspiration favors the passage of the fluid into the pleural space. Thus, patients may have only mild or clinically undetectable ascites.

Once the diagnosis is made treatment follows algorithms for treatment of refractory ascites and include salt and water restriction, diuretics, and other validated options for portal hypertension. Repeated thoracentesis and chest tube placement is discouraged.

Huthayfa Ateeli, Justin Lee, Irbaz Riaz, Meenal Misal

Department of Internal Medicine

University of Arizona

Tucson, AZ

References

1. Huang PM, Chang YL,Yang CY,Lee YC.The morphology of diaphragmatic defects in hepatic hydrothorax: thoracoscopic finding. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130:141-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Lieberman FL, Hidemura R, Peters RL, Reynolds TB. Pathogenesis and treatment of hydrothorax complicating cirrhosis with ascites. Ann Intern Med. 1966;64:341-51. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Emerson PA, Davies JH. Hydrothorax complicating ascites. Lancet. 1955; 268:487-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Mouroux J, Perrin C, Venissac N, Blaive B, Richelme H. Management of pleural effusion of cirrhotic origin. Chest. 1996;109:1093-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Chen A, Ho YS, Tu YC, Tang HS, Cheng TC. Diaphragmatic defect as a cause of massive hydrothorax in cirrhosis of liver. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1988;10:663-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 

Reference as: Ateeli H, Lee J, Riaz I, Misal M. Medical image of the week: hepatic hydrothorax. Southwest J Pulm Crit Care. 2015;10(1):47-8. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13175/swjpcc004-15 PDF

Medical Image of the Week: Pulmonary Herniation

Figure 1. Thoracic CT scan.

  Figure 2. Saggital view of thoracic CT scan.

A 49-year-old obese gentleman with a known history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus and GERD presented with complaints of a popping sensation in his left chest with coughing and deep breathing, associated with pain at the same site. Physical examination showed small bulge at the level of the herniation that was most obvious with coughing. CT scan of chest done 2 months ago showed 2. 5 cm pulmonary hernia identified at the left 7-8 costal interspace (Figures 1 and 2). This was thought to have resulted from an open lung biopsy of his left lung done 4 years before presentation to evaluate for acute respiratory failure or chest tube insertion at same site 3 years prior to presentation for treatment of a pneumothorax. Surgical repair was done with round Bard Kugel hernia patch. His symptoms resolved after the procedure.

Ramasubramanian Baalachandran MD, Naser Mahmou  MD, and Laura Meinke MD

Department of Medicine

University of Arizona – School of Medicine

Tucson, Arizona.

Reference

1. Fackeldey V, Junge K, Hinck D, Franke A, Willis S, Becker HP, Schumpelick V. Repair of intercostal pulmonary herniation. Hernia. 2003;7(4):215-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Reference as: Baalachandran R, Mahmou N, Meinke L. Medical image of the week: pulmonary herniation. Southwest J Pulm Crit Care. 2014;9(4):197-8. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13175/swjpcc122-14 PDF

A Case of Mislabeled Identity

Reference as: Singarajah C, Park K. A case of mislabeled identity. Southwest J Pulm Crit Care 2010;1:22-27. (Click here for PDF version)

A 60-year-old man in the surgical intensive care unit for atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, on his second post-operative day following colectomy, complained of worsening shortness of breath. A chest radiograph (Figure 1) was obtained. A chest radiograph performed one day previous to Figure 1 showed clear lungs, no pleural effusions, and no volume loss.

Question 1 and Figure 1: What are the abnormal findings on the chest radiograph? In particular, what technical error has occurred? 

The frontal chest radiograph shows increased opacity in the bases bilaterally, greater on the side labeled left (see “L” in the image- this is the technologist’s marker). Note the shift of the trachea towards the side labeled left. However, note also the opacity along the superior mediastinum on the right side; this opacity has the appearance of the aortic arch. Note the appearance of the stomach below the diaphragm, ipsilateral to the aortic arch. Also, the opacity at the left lung base shows a configuration resembling the heart. Taken together, these findings raise the possibility that the radiograph is mislabeled, with the “Left” marker (“L”, Figure 1) improperly placed on the patient’s right side. Prior chest radiographs not shown) confirm the patient did not have situs inversus.

There is evidence of volume loss in the right thorax (labeled incorrectly as left in this image). Note the shift of the trachea towards the side with increased lung opacity. The entire left right thorax (again, incorrectly labeled left in this image) is small, and the air column in the right mainstem bronchus abruptly terminated, suggesting endobronchial obstruction.

Furthermore, the patient had no clinical reasons for a new large pleural effusion, and recent prior films showed no pleural fluid.

Surgery was consulted and a procedure was performed. The results of this procedure are shown in Figure 2.

Question 2: What procedure was performed by the surgery team?

The surgery team improperly placed a thoracostomy tube in the left thorax because they misinterpreted Figure 1 as showing a large left pleural effusion. Figure 2 shows the tip of the thoracostomy tube in the medial superior left thorax, associated with subcutaneous emphysema. Progressive volume loss is seen on the right side, again suggesting endobronchial obstruction- note that the residual air in the right upper thorax in Figure 1 is no longer present in Figure 2. The surgery team then improperly placed a thoracostomy tube on the right side, mistaking the small, opacified right thorax for pleural effusion on that side. Figure 3 shows the new right thoracostomy tube tip located over the cranial right thorax.

The surgical team was concerned that the thoracostomy tube showed little fluid output and a second thoracotomy tube was placed on the contralateral side (Figure 3).

 

This tube also did not show significant output. The pulmonary / critical care medicine team was then consulted. The pulmonary / critical care medicine physician performed a procedure which partially corrected the cause of the patient’s original complaints. The chest radiograph following this procedure is shown in Figure 4. 

Question 3: What procedure (s) was performed by the pulmonary / critical care medicine team?

Bronchoscopy was performed, and showed significant mucous plugging. The mucous plugs were removed resulting in improved right lung aeration (Figure 4).

Learning Points:

• Physical exam would have identified improperly labeled chest radiograph
• The chest radiograph shows volume loss, suggesting endobronchial obstruction due to mucous plugging- the side of the thorax showing increased attenuation shows reduced volume. In contrast, pleural effusion would show increased opacity associated with mass effect and shift of the cardiomediastinal structures away from the side of the thorax showing increased attenuation
• Time-outs are no substitute for clinical skills.The patient had two thoracostomy tubes, both placed for incorrect reasons, one of which was placed on the wrong side all together.
• Therapy for atelectasis and mucous plugging includes the following:
  •  Patient mobilization, ambulation, sitting up;
  • Minimize anti-tussive meds (narcotics, etc), minimizes sedation;
  • Chest physiotherapy for the affected lung;
  • Continuous lateral rotation therapy for patients with altered mental status who cannot mobilize  (for example, a Triadyne bed  made by KCI or manual turning);
  • Bronchoscopy, and;
  • Mucolytics are of equivocal benefit

Clement Singarajah MD.  Associate Chief Pulmonary and Critical Care Fellowship, Phoenix VA Hospital and Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center, Phoenix AZ.

Kevin Park, MD, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine fellow, Phoenix VA Hospital and Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center, Phoenix AZ.

Email csingarajah@earthlink.net