Balanced Crystalloids Versus Saline in Sepsis: A Secondary Analysis of the SMART Trial

Brown RM, Wang L, Coston TD, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Aug 27. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Administration of intravenous crystalloid solutions is a fundamental therapy for sepsis, but the effect of crystalloid composition on patient outcomes remains unknown. The authors compared the effect of balanced crystalloids versus saline on 30-day in-hospital mortality among critically ill adults with sepsis. Of 15,802 patients enrolled in SMART, 1,641 patients were admitted to the medical intensive care unit with a diagnosis of sepsis. A total of 217 patients (26.3%) in the balanced crystalloids group experienced 30-day in-hospital morality, compared with 255 patients (31.2%) in the saline group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.59 - 0.93; P = 0.01) but the 60-day mortality did not significantly differ (aOR 0.80 [0.64 to 1.01]). Patients in the balanced group experienced a lower incidence of major adverse kidney events within 30 days (35.4% vs 40.1%; aOR 0.78; 95% CI 0.63 - 0.97) and a greater number of vasopressor-free days (20 ± 12 vs 19 ± 13; aOR 1.25; 95% CI 1.02 - 1.54) and renal replacement therapy-free days (20 ± 12 vs 19 ± 13; aOR 1.35 [1.08 - 1.69]), compared to the saline group. The authors conclude that amongst patients with sepsis in a large randomized trial, use of balanced crystalloids was associated with a lower 30-day in-hospital mortality compared to use of saline. The article is accompanied by a thoughtful editorial authored by Paul Young.

Previous
Previous

Comparative Effectiveness of Combined Favipiravir A and Oseltamivir Therapy Versus Oseltamivir Monotherapy in Critically Ill Patients with Influenza Virus Infection

Next
Next

Association of Aspirin Use with Mortality Risk Among Older Adult Participants in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial